Al Gore Might Yet Join 2008 Contenders
Al Gore Might Yet Join 2008 Contenders
By Jackie Calmes
The Wall Street Journal
Monday 08 May 2006
First there was Clinton-Gore. Could Clinton vs. Gore be next?
For former Vice President Al Gore, a rash of favorable publicity
surrounding this month’s opening of his movie “An Inconvenient Truth,” and
the growing political resonance of its subject - global warming - are
stoking the most serious speculation about a Gore political comeback since
his loss in the 2000 U.S. presidential election.
In 2008, that could mean a once-unimaginable battle for Democrats’
nomination between Bill Clinton’s former vice president and his wife,
Hillary Clinton. To some pro-Gore Democrats, worried about Mrs. Clinton’s
electability, that is part of the appeal.
“I appreciate that buzz, but he’s not running for president,” insists
Michael Feldman, a former vice presidential adviser who is helping promote
the film and Mr. Gore’s new book on which it is based. “He has been
spending a considerable amount of time trying to educate people about the
issue of global warming,” and won’t talk about politics “right now,” Mr.
Feldman says.
The demurrals aren’t persuasive to some Democrats, including former
Clinton-Gore White House insiders. “I do know that he’s thinking about it.
I know for a fact,” a former adviser says. “He’s talked to people about the
pros and cons.”
Among those said to be pushing Mr. Gore are billionaire venture
capitalist and high-tech entrepreneur John Doerr and Laurie David, a
global-warming activist and producer of the film, and wife of “Seinfeld”
and “Curb Your Enthusiasm” creator Larry David. “When people see this
movie, I know they’re going to see the real Al Gore, and they’re going to
demand that he run,” Ms. David says. But, she adds, he changes the subject
whenever it comes up, and had to be talked into making the movie when she
pitched it.
Mr. Gore has begun assembling a Nashville, Tenn.-based operation to
help with the demands on his time. He has hired longtime friend and top
aide Roy Neel to head the office, and environmental activist Kalee Kreider,
from a Washington public-relations firm, to handle communications. Mr.
Feldman says their work will focus on global warming, not on maneuvering
for 2008.
Yet the talk of a political second act for the man who won the 2000
popular vote, but lost in the Electoral College after a U.S. Supreme Court
ruling, exceeds anything before 2004, when Mr. Gore could have sought a
grudge match against President Bush.
In recent weeks, he has been on the covers of Vanity Fair, Wired (its
headline: “The Resurrection of Al Gore”) and American Prospect, a liberal
Democratic magazine. Defeated politically, he nonetheless makes Time’s list
of the world’s 100 most influential people; Mr. Gore is featured under the
headings “Heroes and Pioneers” and “America Takes a Fresh Look at ‘Ozone
Man’” - the derisive nickname coined by the first President Bush in 1992
after Mr. Gore’s previous environmental book, “Earth in the Balance,” came out.
“His star will never be higher than it is right now with his movie
coming out,” says Democratic consultant Karen Skelton, Mr. Gore’s former
political director.
The Gore buzz reflects a sense among even some pro-Clinton Democrats
that Mrs. Clinton, considered the prohibitive favorite for the nomination
given her support in the party’s base of activists and donors, can’t win
the general election because she is a polarizing figure to many voters.
These skeptics believe only someone such as Mr. Gore with the celebrity and
fund-raising potential to match Mrs. Clinton could stop her.
Like Mrs. Clinton, Mr. Gore remains a negative figure to many voters,
says a Democrat who has seen private polls. For both, that might only
increase with the spectacle of a Clinton-Gore brawl. Even insiders can’t
fully account for the bad blood that has built up since. At bottom, they
say, it reflects contrasting views of what cost Mr. Gore the 2000 election:
Mr. Clinton’s scandals, or Mr. Gore’s decision to so fully separate himself
from a president who remained popular amid peace and prosperity. Several
insiders say Mr. Gore is more likely to run if Mrs. Clinton does than if
she doesn’t.
Also controversial among Democrats was Mr. Gore’s 2004 endorsement of
Howard Dean, now the Democratic Party chief, just as Mr. Dean was stumbling
in his presidential primary race against the ultimate nominee,
Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry. Mr. Kerry also is considering another run in
2008, though he, like Mr. Gore, would have the taint of a loser for
partisans craving a fresh face.
According to Mr. Feldman and others, Mr. Gore is enjoying his freer
and more lucrative life as a private citizen. “My expectation is he’s not
going to run in 2008,” says Tad Devine, a top Gore strategist in 2000 who
hasn’t spoken with him lately. “He’s in a really good place, and he’s
succeeding fabulously. Why would he want to walk away from it all?”
Mr. Gore and his wife, Tipper, have a new home in an affluent
Nashville area, and they recently bought a condominium in San Francisco,
nearer to two daughters in California. Since conceding to Mr. Bush, he has
taught at several universities and written two books with his wife. He is
on Apple Computer Inc.’s board and is senior adviser to Google Inc. He has
founded Current, a youth-oriented, interactive cable network, and
Generation Investment Management, which invests in companies deemed
environmentally and socially responsible.
Periodically he has spoken out against Mr. Bush on the environment,
Iraq and alleged abuses of executive power, in speeches promoted by the
liberal group MoveOn.org. And he has widely given the 90-minute lectures
and computer slide shows on global warming that, for all his reputed
stiffness, gave rise to a film that drew standing ovations at the Sundance
Film Festival.
On stage and in the film, a deadpan Mr. Gore opens, to laughs and
applause: “I am Al Gore. I used to be the next president of the United
States of America.”
Mr. Gore, who turns 60 in 2008, could remain noncommittal and enter
the presidential fray late, given his fame and fund-raising potential -
unlike lesser-known Democrats already stumping in the early-nominating
states to be the Clinton alternative, such as former Sen. John Edwards of
North Carolina, former Virginia Gov. Mark Warner, Iowa Gov. Tom Vilsack,
and Indiana Sen. Evan Bayh. If Mr. Gore ran - or were drafted, as Ms. David
suggests - the longtime Washingtonian would run as an outsider, Democrats
expect, helped along by his relationship with Internet-savvy MoveOn.org
activists.
There would be no small irony in Mr. Gore re-emerging with a crusade
against global warming. In 2000, he played down the issue he had so long
been identified with in Congress, on his consultants’ advice. They feared
the younger Bush, like his father, would use the issue to reinforce an
image of Mr. Gore as a bloodless wonk, and make it a jobs question for
voters in swing industrial and coal-mining states. “The campaign took this
issue off the table and robbed him of seeming ‘big’ and visionary,” says
former Clinton White House Chief of Staff John Podesta. “I think he regrets
that.”