Smart Money is on Clint Curtis to Win against Smear-infested Florida Opponent Tom Feeney, Infamous for Trying to Rig Florida Vote *
Ilene PRoctor
INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC RELATIONS
Press Contact: Ilene Proctor and Margery Epstein
Direct Line: (310) 858 6643
Cell: (310) 721.2336
E-mail: [email protected]
http://www.ileneproctor.com
Smart Money is on Clint Curtis to Win against Smear-infested Florida Opponent Tom Feeney, Infamous for Trying to Rig Florida Vote *
Clint Curtis is a recovered Republican. When he was s a computer programmer, Congressman Feeney approached him to rig the Florida vote. Repulsed at the vile suggestion to derail the election, Clint choose instead to become a whistleblower. His political hackles raised, he changed parties and was instrumental in breaking up an Orlando spy ring in 2004, testifying before a Congressional Committee that same year regarding computerized vote fraud.
Tom Feeney has been named #3 on a list of the “Most Corrupt Congressmen in Washington” (http://www.citizensforethics.org/). When Curtis runs against Feeney in the general election in Dist 24 in Florida, it will give the American people an unprecedented opportunity to have the root of vote fraud corruption exposed and to ensure everyone’s vote is counted across America.
This is a historic battle of Good vs. Evil. A battle between the witness and the very Congressman that requested a voting machine prototype that could invisibly alter election results. A battle between the eye witness that has passed a polygraph test in addition to testifying under oath before a Congressional Committee and the career politician who has refused to take the challenge to have his honesty examined. This is a battle that can determine whether this country is a Democracy or simply run by corrupt elitists on unverifiable voting machines.
Clint Curtis is committed to:
* Requiring a paper ballot (as the official document of record) so that voters know their vote counts, regardless of the type of voting system used.
* Revitalizing NASA and returning America to a position of strength, both militarily and scientifically.
* Protecting Social Security from being raided by special interest groups.
* Providing Universal no-fault Health Care and eliminating the cost to business.
* Ensuring that all shipments into the country are secured by Americans working for American companies.
* The redeployment of our troops from Iraq to guard America’s borders and make America safer.
* Achieving energy independence for America today, not 20 years from now. This will also reduce fuel costs by 70%.
* Keeping jobs in America by requiring balanced trade and business incentives.
* Restoring fiscal responsibility to our Budget.
Clint received the Spine Award from the Back Bone Campaign 8/17/06
VIDEO EXCLUSIVE - The Clint Curtis / Tom Feeney Vote-Rigging Scandal as Seen in the New E-Vote Documentary ‘Eternal Vigilance’
Interview with Clint Curtis: http://www.bushbusiness.com/ontherecord.htm#Curtis.
NASA’s TWU endorses Clint Curtis 07/15/2006
DFA Miami-Dade endorses Clint Curtis 06/15/2006
WHAT DID FEENEY KNOW ABOUT COLLEAGUE MARK FOLEY’S PREDATORY BEHAVIOR, AND WHEN DID HE KNOW IT?
Candidate Clint Curtis Calls on Deputy Whip Tom Feeney to Clarify Personal Knowledge of Rep. Foley’s Sexual Overtures to Minors
Clint Curtis, Democratic challenger to Rep. Tom Feeney in Florida’s 24th Congressional District, today called on his opponent, a Deputy Whip in the GOP House leadership, to fully explain his involvement in the latest scandal embroiling the House Republicans. As reported by AP, the GOP House Leadership were informed of disgraced Rep. Mark Foley’s (R-FL-16) abhorrent sexual predatory behavior with minors in the congressional page program nearly a year ago, yet apparently took no action until forced by public outcry last Friday.
As a member of the GOP leadership, Feeney worked closely with Foley as a fellow Deputy Majority Whip in the House, as a colleague in the Florida caucus, and on legislation for the House Caucus on Missing and Exploited Children. Like Mr. Foley, Mr. Feeney has often trumpeted his work to protect children against sexual predators. “If Mr. Feeney knew of and let continue Mr. Foleys sexual overtures to a 16 year old male high school student interning with the Congressman, his sincerity in protecting children is definitely in question.”
“Feeney owes a full explanation to all Floridians in the 24th District and across the state — about when he learned of Foley’s predatory behavior and what actions, if any, he took to protect the kids in this matter. As part of the Republican leadership, he should be calling for legal and ethical accountability,” said Curtis. “The voters of Florida need to know so they can make an informed decision about their leadership in Congress.”
“The Republicans waited only until the issue was disclosed by the media to call for an investigation,” Curtis continued. “Hastert claims that he was only aware of ‘overly-friendly’ emails, but if that is true, I find his judgment severely impaired that he did not look into this – that’s a huge red flag when there are minor children involved.” Did Feeney ignore the same red flags on behalf of his colleague?
New revelations indicate the GOP leadership was aware, as far back as 2001, that Foley had a “page problem”, according to ABC News. The report also says that staffers had gone so far as to “warn” pages “to watch out for Foley” over the years.
Curtis charges that the GOP leadership “did nothing, rather than jeopardize what was considered a ‘safe’ seat. They made a craven political calculation to protect fellow Republicans majority rather than protect the children that were entrusted to their care. They have once again put partisan politics above everything else — even above the children that work with them. We can’t trust them to protect our children, or our country?”
Foley is the fourth Republican to resign from the House under an ethical cloud in the past year, joining indicted former Majority Leader Tom Delay of Texas, and soon-to-be-jailed Bob Ney of Ohio, who pled guilty in the ongoing influence-peddling investigation of Jack Abramoff. Mr. Feeney is the only remaining congressman not yet indicted, to have received a posh golf junket to Scotland which was paid for by convicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff. Once again this year, Feeney has been listed as one of the “Most Corrupt Members of Congress” by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW).
Clint Curtis is the Democratic Candidate for Congress in Florida’s 24th District. A computer programmer, election integrity advocate and whistleblower, Curtis has charged that his opponent Rep. Tom Feeney, among other well-documented misdeeds, asked him to create an electronic vote-rigging computer program while they both worked for the same computer firm in Oviedo, FL in 2000.
###
For more information, see http://www.clintcurtis.com; http://www.citizensforethics.org/
Clint’s Whistle Blowing Story Heard all Over the World:
SEE ATTACHED: Diario della Settimana Editor Enrico Deaglio
335-62-82226
direttore@diario. TRANSLATED :
My name is Enrico DeAglio, and I’m the editor of a weekly magazine called Diaro the news journal based in Milan, it comes out for 10 years. It’s a very well known newspaper of reportage and in depth articles. We began to add to the paper DVD’s, and the first one that was a big success was a DVD about Berlusconi ….., he was our Prime Minister and that was a big success and got very good reviews and very good sales as well. So, we decided to follow the election, and we found out that the elections were very dramatic. What happened? IT happened that all the polls and the exit polls were giving a large victory for the center left coalition. And instead the night in which the votes were counted, all his advantage was eroded hour by hour, half an hour by half an hour, minute by minute, and in the end the race was called too close to call, and at something like 3 o’clock in the morning the officials of the center left commission just said we won for 20,000 votes in a country in which you have 40 million voters.
And so, we shot films of all the night, and then we began thinking, so what really happened? And during this work we found out that the name of Clint Curtis was very well known in Italy among the bloggers and everyone was saying to us, well you have to go to see Mr. Curtis because he did the same thing and he knows exactly how the system works. So, we came to Florida. Mr. Curtis has been very kind, and he has explained not only his experience, and his now political commitment for these reasons, but also he made for us a system, a software program to explain. And to me that really was the most clear explanation, the most clear teaching of what has really happened nationwide in MW: Why did you get Excensure?
ED: We got excensure because we changed our electoral law something like 6 months before the elections, and to do all the changes and experiments in a private content without anything going public.
……….BREAK………..
ED: You know who he was? Karl Rove.
MW: The principal counselor for this man’s election that won. And who was the man who won.
ED: The man who won was Mr. Brodi and he’s the leader of the center left coalition
MW: And he won?
ED: He won for 20,000 votes.
MW: And who was his opponent?
ED: Mr. Berlusconi, who is the tycoon of TV (?) and a lot of money he has all the TV, and all the media and links with the Mafia, everything you can imagine. And he didn’t accept the results, he didn’t concede. In fact officially he didn’t concede until now.
MW: How do you know it was Karl Rove?
ED: It was official. He said it. Karl Rove and there was another company, I can’t remember the name…a polling firm?
MW: A polling firm.
ED: A polling firm that was very well known here because it missed completely the results of the Venezuela elections. There are not the pollsters …. They are making changes with the numbers…they don’t just take the numbers from the public opinion. They are sort-of manipulating the numbers to say…and what they said was Berlusconi was doing very well, Berlusconi had the polls that were magnificent, and all the other polling companies were saying he’s under for something like 6 or 7 points. So that was all sort of propaganda.
MW: And that was in the news media?
ED: Oh yes. Absolutely.
MW: So the big “poller” was in the media? So how is your press? Is your press still free?
ED: It is, I would say yes. The bigger anomaly in Italy is TV, because Berlusconi owns the three major commercial channels. And while he was president we have the state television with three channels and then he owns the other three channels as well. So the complete TV information was in his hands
MW: And even with all that the other guy was still ahead?
ED: He was still ahead because he (Berlusconi) acted very, very, poorly for Italy and people were very angry.
MW: Ah hah! Thank you.
ED
WE found out months and months later. I think you don’t have it in this country, but in Italy you can cast a blank ballot…and usually in Italy you have something like 3.5 million people who just go to vote, go to the polls and don’t vote for anybody just put a blank ballot. This is a constant in every election. It’s a form of protest, it’s a form of not committing, and this time all those blank ballots disappeared and the votes we given to one coalition.
MW: So that’s where you feel the flip happened, is from blank to one particular person?
ED: And Mr. Curtis said it was very easy to do it.
WHILE CLINT WAS DESIGNING THE VOTE FRAUD PROGRAM
CC: we can decide as many variables as we want, so you know you said you wanted to add one blanks, sometimes you wanted to add 90% to one guy, and 10% to the other, you can set that at the same second you so now you know exactly how its going to blow all the way through
ED.: so the time is the most important thing?
CC: well its what we’re using, but time is very easy to use, because time is something that’s very random…. it’s controllable, but random. In other words you don’t know, if you drop your pen you don’t know the exact second its going to hit the ground.
E.D.: I do.
CC: you don’t. You don’t know the exact millisecond its going to hit the ground.
ED.: no, but we should know because physics is the study of mass and velocity and this kind of stuff.
CC: right, but you don’t know, you can’t predict.
ED.: I don’t know.
CC: In other words you can’t stand here and drop your pen at the same time someone stands down there and tries to drop their pen, and they’re going to hit the ground at the exact same time. So we can say randomization. Computers don’t really do random at all, you can do a random number generation and it goes to a cable to look up what to give you as a random number, so its not real. There is nothing random. So in dropping your pen, time is about as random as you can get, based on stuff like that.
CRACKLING…difficult to hear for about 5 seconds.
E: DO you have a minute?
CC: I have two minutes…it’s your minute.
ED: (not audible)
CC: 116 by 40,00 votes…now…
ED: good now we do it again, very close
CC: look this is our receiver, its out there and data has been sent, this guy receives the results as that…we’re choosing a function of one, one is there, even though he was losing by…
ED: he’s winning
CC: without the votes he now won…because we reduced our blanks…we reduced our blanks by function one…which makes it instead of running their normal percentage…now what was our normal percentage?
ED: ?
CC: Its now been reduced down to the difference
ED: oh
CC: simple.
ED: ?
CC: every time we run it this number will change so that you can’t really get it …. Your election results are very bad, they’re very bad and …would never achieve that way I would…but if you run it again the results would be different because the numbers would be different, so if you run it as a 5 and our 5 is now a 1.6 you get different results…so ( ) the results are different and the variable, so its harder to pin it down…cause when the next results come in, lets say the next results come in…
ED: so you’re talking now division of the results when the stream of the numbers comes in
CC: yes, so when the numbers come in on the stream, they come in correctly but they get recorded incorrectly…
ED: …and you have the possibility if you want to make one guy to win, just move it a little bit or take it back a little bit
CC: right, just roll it in and out wherever you want to put it
ED: so when you are in a very too close to call election in the last minutes and there are only 20,000 votes in all the country then… from one to the other you can easily adjust them?
CC: well, with this you have enough blank votes honestly, to sway almost any election cause you run between 5 and 10 % and unless the guy running against the other guy is a real clown he’s probably within 5 to 10 % anyway. So this type of result would sway almost any of your elections. You just get your blank votes to hide into the 1.2 reading (?) as opposed to the normal 10 or 5 or 8, and you don’t even have to switch votes
ED: Now I don’t want to be discovered. What should I do?
CC: How would you be discovered? If they don’t audit this backwards, they don’t audit those blank votes to verify them…so you take your final result blank votes, and you go back and you check and see what those blank votes really are, that’s how you catch it.
ED: But you don’t have any numbers, you should have it in the real thing, the real ballots…
CC: You should have it in the real ballots
ED: because you can’t change the number going back
CC: oh yeah, if they report it, if Roma(?) reported this information, I would report that, that information…I received that. And then 6 months later when I finally get the election results you’re not going to look and see if its right or not, you’re not even going to remember, but it may stand out if all these results go down to 1% when they used to be 10%. But the problem with this is 50, 000 people voted blank in Roma. You report 810, so you need to find 811 people who voted blank…
ED: Is there any law that permits to uh sue somebody for giving absent(?) tickets?
CC: I doubt it, I doubt it, most of the laws are written, at least in this country, to protect these guys. The only law that really holds them accountable here…
ED: I mean if we could have a situation in which one party usually gets lets say 20% of the votes, somebody has 8%, nobody can explain why but, the numbers, the figures say he’s got 8%. This is absent. Can you do something?
CC: Probably not. If you go back and you find 10,000 blanks that stand up, they’re just going to go, “Oops, I guess we had an error”. That’s all they’re gonna do. That’s what they do here all the time. We had absolutely crazy results. We had a judge in Texas that used to get 74% of the vote all the time, and in some precincts he got no votes at all…zero. Absolutely impossible, but there is no way to check, there’s no way to go back, so that’s why that happens. Because they control the game you would have to take the control away from them. So, they can be verified by the people. And again all you have to do is go back to the ballots…
ED: small…the small ones
CC: The smallest the better. Find the ones where they made the biggest mistakes…
ED: But when you find them you’ll have from the other side just my excuses…
CC: You’ll have it for the first one and the second one and the third one, by the time you get to the tenth and the twelfth one I think they’re excuses will wear a little thin.
ED: Big excuses
CC: Then they get bigger excuses, “well its excensures fault, they must not be able to add” you know, which is really all you need to get back to and the fix problem. As far as attaching blame to people is very hard to do.
ED: What happens to that … when you put it somewhere? You can just take away and cancel?
CC: It can cancel itself. This little function here, this nine line function that can be in a separate module.
ED: What module?
CC: A module? Well okay. These programs aren’t necessarily one separate program, they’re all little pieces that lay out there. You can easily override anything you want to hide, but most people don’t have access to look. In this country everything is proprietary, so a citizen does not have the right to go look…so you don’t have to hide it too hard if you have no ability to look for it.
ED: wow!
CC: Disturbing huh?