Democratic Talk Radio
Democratic Talk Radio Discussion Forums. (total 581 members)
Index / General / General Discussion
author message
Lyons 9/24
Post a new topic Reply to this Topic Printable Version of this Topic Forward this Topic to your Friend Topic Commands (for administrator or moderators only)
Wendell
Premium member
in Members

View this member's profileSearch all posts from this memberSend an email to this member
posts: 478
since: 07-12-2001
1. Lyons 9/24
Reply to this topic with quote Modify your message
Gene Lyons
September 24, 2003

Beating Texas One More Time

Pardon my provincialism, but part of Gen.Wesley Clark's hometown
appeal is the opportunity his candidacy gives Arkansans to beat Texas
again. The David & Goliath aspect of the Razorbacks vs. Longhorns sports
rivalry provides a window into the Arkansas soul. I must have talked to
half a dozen people at Clark's Little Rock announcement of his
presidential hopes who compared it to the Hogs recent 38-28 victory in
Austin.

"We do this every 12 years," somebody joked. "It's an Arkansas
tradition." Indeed it was on a similarly perfect autumn day in October
1991 that my wife and I encountered Bill and Hillary Clinton at a
pre-game party outside War Memorial Stadium.Clinton was engaged in his
faintly risible statewide tour asking voters to let him drop his promise
to serve a full term as governor to seek the presidency.

It was one of the oddest days in recent Arkansas history. That
morning, we'd learned that the venerable Arkansas Gazette had folded,
replaced by the implacably Republican Democrat-Gazette. That afternoon,
the last Arkansas-Texas football game in the old Southwest Conference
was played. After the Razorbacks won, players, band members,
cheerleaders and fans lingered on the field, celebrating and lamenting
the end of an era.

At the pre-game party, Diane, a Pryor loyalist and no big Clinton
fan, had given the Big Dog a hug and told him to go for it. Raised and
educated in Arkansas, the prospect of a homegrown president meant a lot
to her. I remember asking Hillary if they'd lost their minds. Didn't she
realize, I asked, that their private lives would be laid open like a
fish on a cutting board? We had a brief, animated exchange that taught
me a lot about her fear and loathing of the press. I've often thought
about it since that day.

Seeing both Clintons as life-sized figures, I failed to comprehend
the magnitude of their ambition. Nobody who spends as much time alone
with books and animals as I do possibly could. Nor could anybody have
anticipated how gaining the White House would turn them into symbols:
media-magnified projections of the hopes and fears of millions. Nor how
far Washington political journalism--pushed by right-wing, Daddy
Warbucks cash, and pulled by the lure of the kind of sublunary fame
available to pundits in the cable TV era--would descend to the tabloid
ethics of the cult of celebrity. (I've an essay on this theme in the
October Harper's Magazine.)

Clark's campaign could well hinge upon how well he understands the
Washington press. So far, he's played shrewdly upon his media image as a
Democrat whose credentials in the post-9/11 era might have been dreamed
up by Central Casting: first in his West Point class, Rhodes Scholar,
decorated Vietnam Vet, four-star general, NATO Supreme Commander,
handsome, articulate, self-confident, straight as an arrow, etc. If
Clark wins the nomination, we won't be seeing any TV ads showing
President Junior prancing across the USS Abraham Lincoln in his tailored
flyboy costume.

Date: 09-25-2003 on 01:27 a.m.
Wendell
Premium member
in Members

View this member's profileSearch all posts from this memberSend an email to this member
posts: 478
since: 07-12-2001
2. Re:Lyons 9/24
Reply to this topic with quote Modify your message
Clark clearly understands that trashing that impeccable image
would be Job #1 for the GOP. He told an Esquire interviewer "the
ultimate consideration for anyone running for president against George
Bush [is] 'how much pain you can bear.'" His enemies will try to portray
him as a real-life equivalent of Gen. Jack D. Ripper, the loony
megalomaniac from "Dr. Strangelove." Even before Clark announced, the
Washington Post ran a profile featuring some extraordinarily venomous
quotes--all anonymous--portraying him as tempermental, vain and
manipulative.

"I have watched him at close range for 35 years, in which I have
looked at the allegation, and I found it totally unsupported," responded
Gen. Barry R. McCaffrey... "That's not to say he isn't ambitious and
quick. He is probably among the top five most talented I've met in my
life. I think he is a national treasure who has a lot to offer the
country."

Evaluating this stuff, it's helpful to remember the sheer
nastiness of Pentagon infighting. When it comes to office politics,
soldiers are worse than professors.

The alternate GOP line of attack advanced by New York Times
columnist William Safire--that Arkansan Clark is merely a stalking horse
for Hillary Clinton's conspiratorial plotting--will get them nowhere.
Besides conflicting with the mad ambition theme, Clark's too clearly
nobody's puppet.

But where Clark can go badly wrong is by trusting the
self-promoting stars and starlets of the Washington press. As a
presidential candidate, he's dealing with a different breed than monthly
magazine writers who've composed admiring profiles. No more open-ended
conversations, or thinking out loud in the presence of reporters like
the ones for the New York Times and Washington Post who turned his
perfectly consistent--if imprecisely expressed--thoughts about Iraq into
a widely-hyped "flip-flop" last week.

Sad to say, he needs to keep them at arms length and feed them
nothing but soundbites.

Date: 09-25-2003 on 01:27 a.m.
Lyons 9/24
Post a new topic Reply to this Topic Printable Version of this Topic Forward this Topic to your Friend Topic Commands (for administrator or moderators only)
All times are EST. < Prev. | P. 1 | Next >
Rate Topic:
 
Go to:
 

Powered by UltraBoard 2000 Standard Edition,
Copyright © UltraScripts.com, Inc. 1999-2000.